King Hall Open House
November 4th, 2008On Saturday, November 1, 2008, the UC Davis School of Law held an open house for prospective law school applicants. Not coincidentally, a handful of Phi Alpha Delta members filled up many of the available attendance slots. The event kicked off in the Wilkins Moot Courtroom where Vik Amar, the Associate Dean of Academic Affairs set the tone by drawing out four criteria to measure law schools by: the faculty, the balance the faculty has with regard to scholarship versus teaching, the sense of community, and the physical space. Although he discussed how Davis incorporates all four of these, he emphasized the attention to teaching and sense of collaboration/shared commitment that separates Davis from the rest. After, Eric Toscano, a current 3L, wrapped up the opening sentiments by elaborating on his experience as a student by centering on three main points: the collegial atmosphere, the quality of education, and the job prospects at King Hall. Following this, a session on admissions and financial aid commenced. Sharon Pinkney, the Assistant Dean of Admission and Enrollment, discussed at length the process of evaluating applications, including a detailed analysis of the weight various elements bear on the decision. Lawrence Gallardo, the Assistant Dean of Admission and Enrollment, described the course and options for receiving financial aid at UC Davis School of Law, which primarily consist of federal loans and grants. Information about the FAFSA form and Need Access Application was also provided here. After a brief intermission, the PAD members broke up into two classrooms to listen to two different student panels; one focused on Career Services, while the other focused on Externships and Clinics. For round two of paneling, a select faculty panel was provided by the event. Here, professors Evelyn Lewis, Clay Tanaka, Director of Academic Success Emily Randon, and Vik Amar, presented their specific interests of law and talked briefly about the international dimensions that are trickling into law. Towards the end of the session, they answered a number of questions from the audience pertaining to law school, preparation, class methods/skills, etc. With that, the open house adjourned. Shortly after, the PAD members reached a unanimous verdict: the event was guilty of being a complete success!



